<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-11-21:/</id><title>Hard of Understanding</title><link rel="self" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/comments/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/"/><subtitle>Another perspective on things going on. So, come on in and join the madness.</subtitle><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-21T11:11:54+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-11-03:/2009/11/03/londin-underground-become-censors-7297467/#c11389158</id><title>In response to:London Underground become censors</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/11/03/londin-underground-become-censors-7297467/#c11389158"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-11-03T10:33:42+01:00</published><updated>2009-11-03T10:33:42+01:00</updated><content type="html">Be interesting to see what the ASA's stance on this is. After all, they're the people who are paid for censorship judgments.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-11-03:/2009/11/03/londin-underground-become-censors-7297467/#c11389055</id><title>In response to:London Underground become censors</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/11/03/londin-underground-become-censors-7297467/#c11389055"/><author><name>SeasideMan</name></author><published>2009-11-03T10:19:22+01:00</published><updated>2009-11-03T10:19:22+01:00</updated><content type="html">It's all pretty subjective, isn't it?</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-11-02:/2009/10/19/why-my-children-will-be-discouraged-from-the-comments-sections-after-articles-7202029/#c11381084</id><title>In response to:If you have nothing encouraging or constructive to say............</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/19/why-my-children-will-be-discouraged-from-the-comments-sections-after-articles-7202029/#c11381084"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-11-02T13:38:55+01:00</published><updated>2009-11-02T13:38:55+01:00</updated><content type="html">Thanks, I appreciate that!!!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-24:/2009/10/24/which-bank-is-hosting-the-bnp-7234797/#c11297544</id><title>In response to:Which bank is hosting the BNP?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/24/which-bank-is-hosting-the-bnp-7234797/#c11297544"/><author><name>anyak</name></author><published>2009-10-24T20:41:36+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-24T20:41:36+02:00</updated><content type="html">lucky im wi the horse then</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-24:/2009/10/24/which-bank-is-hosting-the-bnp-7234797/#c11293930</id><title>In response to:Which bank is hosting the BNP?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/24/which-bank-is-hosting-the-bnp-7234797/#c11293930"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-10-24T13:30:08+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-24T13:30:08+02:00</updated><content type="html">I knew that I could count on someone to make me smile.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks!!!!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-24:/2009/10/24/which-bank-is-hosting-the-bnp-7234797/#c11293872</id><title>In response to:Which bank is hosting the BNP?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/24/which-bank-is-hosting-the-bnp-7234797/#c11293872"/><author><name>prydwen</name></author><published>2009-10-24T13:24:08+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-24T13:24:08+02:00</updated><content type="html">Well you can be sure it aint Lloyds, the sign of the Black Horse would put them off</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-23:/2009/10/20/younger-bodies-7208517/#c11284934</id><title>In response to:Younger Bodies</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/20/younger-bodies-7208517/#c11284934"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-10-23T13:01:09+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-23T13:01:09+02:00</updated><content type="html">I see exactly what you mean. We do appear to have delevoped a "peter pan" culture without even realising it.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-22:/2009/10/22/a-day-to-bury-bad-news-7222158/#c11278759</id><title>In response to:A day to bury bad news</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/22/a-day-to-bury-bad-news-7222158/#c11278759"/><author><name>anony mouse</name></author><published>2009-10-22T19:43:53+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-22T19:43:53+02:00</updated><content type="html">Apparently, it was all supposed to come out this Tuesday, but was delayed until today. I wonder why Gordon?</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-22:/2009/10/22/a-day-to-bury-bad-news-7222158/#c11275479</id><title>In response to:A day to bury bad news</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/22/a-day-to-bury-bad-news-7222158/#c11275479"/><author><name>I_Am_Xenon</name></author><published>2009-10-22T14:04:13+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-22T14:04:13+02:00</updated><content type="html">You expect otherwise from the government? </content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-20:/2009/10/20/younger-bodies-7208517/#c11256928</id><title>In response to:Younger Bodies</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/20/younger-bodies-7208517/#c11256928"/><author><name>anyak</name></author><published>2009-10-20T17:14:05+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-20T17:14:05+02:00</updated><content type="html">why cant people grow old naturaly eh ? id hate  to be made of plastic</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-20:/2009/10/19/why-my-children-will-be-discouraged-from-the-comments-sections-after-articles-7202029/#c11251437</id><title>In response to:If you have nothing encouraging or constructive to say............</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/19/why-my-children-will-be-discouraged-from-the-comments-sections-after-articles-7202029/#c11251437"/><author><name>GilraenH</name></author><published>2009-10-20T07:00:33+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-20T07:00:33+02:00</updated><content type="html">I agree - we could do with you over at the Respectful blogging group. :)</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-19:/2009/10/19/why-my-children-will-be-discouraged-from-the-comments-sections-after-articles-7202029/#c11247548</id><title>In response to:If you have nothing encouraging or constructive to say............</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/19/why-my-children-will-be-discouraged-from-the-comments-sections-after-articles-7202029/#c11247548"/><author><name>deleted user</name></author><published>2009-10-19T17:52:59+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-19T17:52:59+02:00</updated><content type="html">say again?</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-12:/2009/10/12/selling-public-assets-7153002/#c11181851</id><title>In response to:Selling public assets</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/12/selling-public-assets-7153002/#c11181851"/><author><name>deleted user</name></author><published>2009-10-12T15:09:17+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-12T15:09:17+02:00</updated><content type="html">i would not worry about its a piece of piss!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-05:/2009/10/04/do-you-believe-that-journalists-have-a-soul-7095027/#c11115799</id><title>In response to:Do you believe that Journalists have a soul?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/04/do-you-believe-that-journalists-have-a-soul-7095027/#c11115799"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-10-05T13:09:58+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-05T13:09:58+02:00</updated><content type="html">yeah, fair enough.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Suppose I could rename it, "What Cost Ethics in Journalism?"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
was not in a fantastic mood when I was reading the paper yesterday, as you may have noticed!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-10-05:/2009/10/04/do-you-believe-that-journalists-have-a-soul-7095027/#c11115771</id><title>In response to:Do you believe that Journalists have a soul?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/10/04/do-you-believe-that-journalists-have-a-soul-7095027/#c11115771"/><author><name>technomist</name></author><published>2009-10-05T13:06:04+02:00</published><updated>2009-10-05T13:06:04+02:00</updated><content type="html">Maybe they can see theselves in the mirror. But they have to eat. </content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-09-23:/2009/09/23/justin-lee-collins-calls-for-forsyth-to-resign-7023305/#c11011684</id><title>In response to:Justin Lee-Collins calls for Forsyth to resign</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/09/23/justin-lee-collins-calls-for-forsyth-to-resign-7023305/#c11011684"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-09-23T11:05:49+02:00</published><updated>2009-09-23T11:05:49+02:00</updated><content type="html">Thanks! :)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Though I probably should point out that I'm not a die hard Brucie fan (I can happily take or leave him, I don't even watch strictly!)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I just really get on one when someone with ideas WAY above their station start mouthing off about others simply to further their own career. If you didn't know better you'd think that he'd consider himself suitable for the role.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-09-23:/2009/09/23/justin-lee-collins-calls-for-forsyth-to-resign-7023305/#c11011331</id><title>In response to:Justin Lee-Collins calls for Forsyth to resign</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/09/23/justin-lee-collins-calls-for-forsyth-to-resign-7023305/#c11011331"/><author><name>10loves10</name></author><published>2009-09-23T10:13:45+02:00</published><updated>2009-09-23T10:13:45+02:00</updated><content type="html">Haha! Well put!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-09-21:/2009/09/16/a-railway-company-s-sense-of-humour-6978429/#c10991984</id><title>In response to:A Railway Company's Sense of Humour</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/09/16/a-railway-company-s-sense-of-humour-6978429/#c10991984"/><author><name>Cutecoco</name></author><published>2009-09-21T08:11:39+02:00</published><updated>2009-09-21T08:11:39+02:00</updated><content type="html">Hey !! nice blog !!wonna see mine ??plz visit my blog I’am Carole and u can chek my blog at cutecocoblog or at www.cutecoco.blog.co.uk/ plz respond as fast as u can cz I’am online FOR THE NEXT 30 MINUTES  and don’t forget  the comments I hope u contacte me soon see ya</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-09-17:/2009/09/16/a-railway-company-s-sense-of-humour-6978429/#c10960338</id><title>In response to:A Railway Company's Sense of Humour</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/09/16/a-railway-company-s-sense-of-humour-6978429/#c10960338"/><author><name>10loves10</name></author><published>2009-09-17T08:45:08+02:00</published><updated>2009-09-17T08:45:08+02:00</updated><content type="html">Made me snigger!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-09-16:/2009/02/17/kissing-banned-at-railway-station-5594529/#c10956233</id><title>In response to:Kissing Banned at Railway Station</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/02/17/kissing-banned-at-railway-station-5594529/#c10956233"/><author><name>luckystar2591</name></author><published>2009-09-16T19:45:40+02:00</published><updated>2009-09-16T19:45:40+02:00</updated><content type="html">I wonder exactly how much their paying the poor station master to enforce it. Can you imagine some poor old bloke in a orange vest trying to prise apart to snogging chavs with a can opener? </content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-09-09:/2009/09/08/wispa-gold-6926863/#c10885625</id><title>In response to:Wispa Gold</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/09/08/wispa-gold-6926863/#c10885625"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-09-09T00:50:21+02:00</published><updated>2009-09-09T00:50:21+02:00</updated><content type="html">ha, the old ones are the best!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-09-09:/2009/09/08/wispa-gold-6926863/#c10885619</id><title>In response to:Wispa Gold</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/09/08/wispa-gold-6926863/#c10885619"/><author><name>Palmblogging</name></author><published>2009-09-09T00:48:57+02:00</published><updated>2009-09-09T00:48:57+02:00</updated><content type="html">George Michael was rushed to hospital earlier tonight with a choclate bar stuck up his bum.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A spokeman for the hopital thinks it may have just been a Careless Wispa .............boom boom ;-)</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-08-29:/2009/08/29/murdoch-attack-on-dominant-bbc-6848132/#c10792653</id><title>In response to:Murdoch attack on 'dominant' BBC</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/08/29/murdoch-attack-on-dominant-bbc-6848132/#c10792653"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-08-29T15:13:54+02:00</published><updated>2009-08-29T15:13:54+02:00</updated><content type="html">Yeah, I chose socialist as a fairly broad umbrella term. I could perhaps have chosen a more appropriate term, but it'll do.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The editors / readers of "Socialist Worker" would have a field day with me about it, but hey ho.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-08-29:/2009/08/29/murdoch-attack-on-dominant-bbc-6848132/#c10792620</id><title>In response to:Murdoch attack on 'dominant' BBC</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/08/29/murdoch-attack-on-dominant-bbc-6848132/#c10792620"/><author><name>silverliz</name></author><published>2009-08-29T15:07:46+02:00</published><updated>2009-08-29T15:07:46+02:00</updated><content type="html">A Murdock talking about independent news media now that really is something to chew/choke on !  My understanding of the Murdock empire is that they want to control all national newspapers, television and now radio.  &lt;br&gt;
THIS IS THE MURDOCK NEWS  COMING TO YOU FROM THE MURDOCK EMPIRE IN NEW YORK.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
BBC radio broadcasts drama,information,music for people not interested, at least for half an hour in buying or selling.  Hurray.&lt;br&gt;
I'm interested in your use of the word socialism haven't seen that in print for a long time.  Beginning to think it was banned.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-08-12:/2009/08/11/fired-for-being-married-to-a-porn-6703437/#c10650109</id><title>In response to:Fired for being married to a Porn*</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/08/11/fired-for-being-married-to-a-porn-6703437/#c10650109"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-08-12T11:33:37+02:00</published><updated>2009-08-12T11:33:37+02:00</updated><content type="html">I've no doubt that they would, but just on reading the article it's interesting to see how "committees" make their decisions when under "public pressure."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And to which section of the public they answer to.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-08-12:/2009/08/11/fired-for-being-married-to-a-porn-6703437/#c10647816</id><title>In response to:Fired for being married to a Porn*</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/08/11/fired-for-being-married-to-a-porn-6703437/#c10647816"/><author><name>I_Am_Xenon</name></author><published>2009-08-12T03:15:30+02:00</published><updated>2009-08-12T03:15:30+02:00</updated><content type="html">A good lawyer would be able to cram that firing down the throats of the Florida public officials and make them very, very embarrassed that they would do such a thing. Especially with the US Bill of Rights and all that.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Meanwhile, in Canada, if a public official was found out to be married to a porn star, our collective reaction would be "Canada has porn stars???". :D&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Seriously, though, Canadians wouldn't have a problem with it. More than 30 years ago a federal cabinet minister was revealed to have forged the signature of his married girlfriend's husband so that she could get an abortion. Public opinion was on his side, and he's now a Canadian senator...</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-08-11:/2009/02/10/porn-vs-prostitution-5547533/#c10647272</id><title>In response to:Porn Vs. Prostitution</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/02/10/porn-vs-prostitution-5547533/#c10647272"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-08-11T23:36:47+02:00</published><updated>2009-08-11T23:36:47+02:00</updated><content type="html">Agency?</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-08-04:/2009/02/10/porn-vs-prostitution-5547533/#c10585643</id><title>In response to:Porn Vs. Prostitution</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/02/10/porn-vs-prostitution-5547533/#c10585643"/><author><name>Solicitors Wakefield</name></author><published>2009-08-04T10:46:09+02:00</published><updated>2009-08-04T10:46:09+02:00</updated><content type="html">Interesting thought...  I can't see the difference with porn and prostitution apart from the fact;  Like has been mentioned prostitution is more of a 1 on 1 thing.  Also prostitution has had a lot of bad press, with all the prostitutes apparently being forced drugs by their pimps and children being taken and forced to work in the trade, whereas porn is seen as beautiful women and the dream job for some...  Not always the case in both professions and people need to realise this and be open to both.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Well, my opinion anyway.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-08-02:/2009/08/02/hacker-s-extradition-cannot-be-blocked-6635074/#c10570669</id><title>In response to:"Hacker's Extradition cannot be blocked"</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/08/02/hacker-s-extradition-cannot-be-blocked-6635074/#c10570669"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-08-02T13:07:07+02:00</published><updated>2009-08-02T13:07:07+02:00</updated><content type="html">I understand that the Americans have promised to look after Mr McKinnon in relation to his needs, but to those (including politicians) who consider this acceptable, may I point out the following.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nobody in the UK trusts a single politician to be honest with petty cash, in the same way that no one in the UK would want to be caught up in the US penal system, the general consensus is that you get dumped and forgotten and no amount of PR and spin will change that view in many brits (or US citizens for that matter)</content></entry><entry><id>tag:hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk,2009-07-31:/2009/07/30/whiter-shade-of-royalties-6619160/#c10557486</id><title>In response to:Whiter Shade of Royalties</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://hardofunderstanding.blog.co.uk/2009/07/30/whiter-shade-of-royalties-6619160/#c10557486"/><author><name>bacardiancoke</name></author><published>2009-07-31T14:09:41+02:00</published><updated>2009-07-31T14:09:41+02:00</updated><content type="html">Oh yes as someone who knows a few lawyers, I fully support that view, I had no intention to mock the lawyers in this case (best not to as my wife aspires to be one!!!!)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I was thinking more in derision towards this musician who lifted a riff from a famous piece of classical music and then calls it his own</content></entry></feed>
