Hard of Understanding

In response to:London Underground become censors

Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:33:42 +0100

Be interesting to see what the ASA's stance on this is. After all, they're the people who are paid for censorship judgments.

In response to:London Underground become censors

Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:19:22 +0100

It's all pretty subjective, isn't it?

In response to:If you have nothing encouraging or constructive to say............

Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:38:55 +0100

Thanks, I appreciate that!!!

In response to:Which bank is hosting the BNP?

Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:41:36 +0200

lucky im wi the horse then

In response to:Which bank is hosting the BNP?

Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:30:08 +0200

I knew that I could count on someone to make me smile.

Thanks!!!!

In response to:Which bank is hosting the BNP?

Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:24:08 +0200

Well you can be sure it aint Lloyds, the sign of the Black Horse would put them off

In response to:Younger Bodies

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:01:09 +0200

I see exactly what you mean. We do appear to have delevoped a "peter pan" culture without even realising it.

In response to:A day to bury bad news

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:43:53 +0200

Apparently, it was all supposed to come out this Tuesday, but was delayed until today. I wonder why Gordon?

In response to:A day to bury bad news

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:04:13 +0200

You expect otherwise from the government?

In response to:Younger Bodies

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:14:05 +0200

why cant people grow old naturaly eh ? id hate to be made of plastic

In response to:If you have nothing encouraging or constructive to say............

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:00:33 +0200

I agree - we could do with you over at the Respectful blogging group. :)

In response to:If you have nothing encouraging or constructive to say............

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:52:59 +0200

say again?

In response to:Selling public assets

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:09:17 +0200

i would not worry about its a piece of piss!

In response to:Do you believe that Journalists have a soul?

Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:09:58 +0200

yeah, fair enough.

Suppose I could rename it, "What Cost Ethics in Journalism?"

was not in a fantastic mood when I was reading the paper yesterday, as you may have noticed!

In response to:Do you believe that Journalists have a soul?

Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:06:04 +0200

Maybe they can see theselves in the mirror. But they have to eat.

In response to:Justin Lee-Collins calls for Forsyth to resign

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:05:49 +0200

Thanks! :)

Though I probably should point out that I'm not a die hard Brucie fan (I can happily take or leave him, I don't even watch strictly!)

I just really get on one when someone with ideas WAY above their station start mouthing off about others simply to further their own career. If you didn't know better you'd think that he'd consider himself suitable for the role.

In response to:Justin Lee-Collins calls for Forsyth to resign

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:13:45 +0200

Haha! Well put!

In response to:A Railway Company's Sense of Humour

Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:11:39 +0200

Hey !! nice blog !!wonna see mine ??plz visit my blog I’am Carole and u can chek my blog at cutecocoblog or at www.cutecoco.blog.co.uk/ plz respond as fast as u can cz I’am online FOR THE NEXT 30 MINUTES and don’t forget the comments I hope u contacte me soon see ya

In response to:A Railway Company's Sense of Humour

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:45:08 +0200

Made me snigger!

In response to:Kissing Banned at Railway Station

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:45:40 +0200

I wonder exactly how much their paying the poor station master to enforce it. Can you imagine some poor old bloke in a orange vest trying to prise apart to snogging chavs with a can opener?

In response to:Wispa Gold

Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:50:21 +0200

ha, the old ones are the best!

In response to:Wispa Gold

Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:48:57 +0200

George Michael was rushed to hospital earlier tonight with a choclate bar stuck up his bum.

A spokeman for the hopital thinks it may have just been a Careless Wispa .............boom boom ;-)

In response to:Murdoch attack on 'dominant' BBC

Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:13:54 +0200

Yeah, I chose socialist as a fairly broad umbrella term. I could perhaps have chosen a more appropriate term, but it'll do.

The editors / readers of "Socialist Worker" would have a field day with me about it, but hey ho.

In response to:Murdoch attack on 'dominant' BBC

Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:07:46 +0200

A Murdock talking about independent news media now that really is something to chew/choke on ! My understanding of the Murdock empire is that they want to control all national newspapers, television and now radio.
THIS IS THE MURDOCK NEWS COMING TO YOU FROM THE MURDOCK EMPIRE IN NEW YORK.

BBC radio broadcasts drama,information,music for people not interested, at least for half an hour in buying or selling. Hurray.
I'm interested in your use of the word socialism haven't seen that in print for a long time. Beginning to think it was banned.

In response to:Fired for being married to a Porn*

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:33:37 +0200

I've no doubt that they would, but just on reading the article it's interesting to see how "committees" make their decisions when under "public pressure."

And to which section of the public they answer to.

In response to:Fired for being married to a Porn*

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:15:30 +0200

A good lawyer would be able to cram that firing down the throats of the Florida public officials and make them very, very embarrassed that they would do such a thing. Especially with the US Bill of Rights and all that.

Meanwhile, in Canada, if a public official was found out to be married to a porn star, our collective reaction would be "Canada has porn stars???". :D

Seriously, though, Canadians wouldn't have a problem with it. More than 30 years ago a federal cabinet minister was revealed to have forged the signature of his married girlfriend's husband so that she could get an abortion. Public opinion was on his side, and he's now a Canadian senator...

In response to:Porn Vs. Prostitution

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:36:47 +0200

Agency?

In response to:Porn Vs. Prostitution

Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:46:09 +0200

Interesting thought... I can't see the difference with porn and prostitution apart from the fact; Like has been mentioned prostitution is more of a 1 on 1 thing. Also prostitution has had a lot of bad press, with all the prostitutes apparently being forced drugs by their pimps and children being taken and forced to work in the trade, whereas porn is seen as beautiful women and the dream job for some... Not always the case in both professions and people need to realise this and be open to both.

Well, my opinion anyway.

In response to:"Hacker's Extradition cannot be blocked"

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:07:07 +0200

I understand that the Americans have promised to look after Mr McKinnon in relation to his needs, but to those (including politicians) who consider this acceptable, may I point out the following.

Nobody in the UK trusts a single politician to be honest with petty cash, in the same way that no one in the UK would want to be caught up in the US penal system, the general consensus is that you get dumped and forgotten and no amount of PR and spin will change that view in many brits (or US citizens for that matter)

In response to:Whiter Shade of Royalties

Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:09:41 +0200

Oh yes as someone who knows a few lawyers, I fully support that view, I had no intention to mock the lawyers in this case (best not to as my wife aspires to be one!!!!)

I was thinking more in derision towards this musician who lifted a riff from a famous piece of classical music and then calls it his own